Apollo Alnac 4G Winter review
The Apollo Alnac 4G Winter is highly regarded by users for its exceptional value and reliable performance in diverse winter conditions. Drivers consistently praise the tire for its impressive traction in deep snow and confident braking capabilities on wet surfaces, making it a standout budget-friendly option.
Owners rate it 12.6 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
89%By road tests
76.4%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 4 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Apollo Alnac 4G Winter is highly regarded by users for its exceptional value and reliable performance in diverse winter conditions. Drivers consistently praise the tire for its impressive traction in deep snow and confident braking capabilities on wet surfaces, making it a standout budget-friendly option.
Pros
- Excellent traction and handling in deep snow conditions
- Strong braking performance on wet roads
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
- Exceptional value for the price point
Cons
- Limited long-term durability data available from current user feedback
- Brand perception may be less established compared to premium competitors
Worth knowing
- Users living in mountainous regions report high confidence in the tire's ability to handle significant snow accumulation.
4 published test appearances
Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.
2024 Auto Bild Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16
12th of 20
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Handling | 8th of 20 | |
| Dry Braking | 10th of 20 | |
| Dry Handling | 13th of 20 | |
| Snow Braking | 18th of 20 | |
| Snow Traction | 14th of 20 | |
| Snow Handling | 17th of 20 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 11th of 20 | |
| Straight Aqua | 15th of 20 | |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 17th of 20 | |
| Noise | 4th of 20 | |
| Value | 6th of 20 | |
| Wear | 14th of 20 | |
| Total Cost of Ownership | 9th of 20 |
2024 Winter 55 tire Braking Test · 205/55 R16
15th of 55
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 8th of 55 | |
| Snow Braking | 22nd of 55 |
2021 Winter tire Market Overview · 205/55 R16
30th of 49
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 33rd of 49 | |
| Snow Braking | 27th of 49 |
2018 51 Winter tire Shootout · 195/65 R15
22nd of 51
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|