BFGoodrich Touring review
The BFGoodrich Touring (often identified in user feedback as sharing architecture with Tigar, Kormoran, and Orium brands) receives highly polarized reviews regarding its performance. While some users praise its exceptional longevity and value, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling predictability.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
56%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 7 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The BFGoodrich Touring (often identified in user feedback as sharing architecture with Tigar, Kormoran, and Orium brands) receives highly polarized reviews regarding its performance. While some users praise its exceptional longevity and value, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling predictability.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High value-to-cost ratio
- Satisfactory dry road handling for daily commuting
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and traction
- Tendency for abrupt understeer in slippery conditions
- Dated performance characteristics compared to modern competitors
- Unpredictable handling on slick surfaces like drain covers
Worth knowing
- Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Kia Picanto reported high satisfaction with longevity, reaching over 90,000km.
- Drivers of mid-sized sedans like the Skoda Octavia noted that the tire's performance limitations become more apparent and concerning during spirited or varied weather driving.