Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Avon Ranger H/TT vs BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ranger H/TT | Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ranger H/TT | Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ranger H/TT | Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ranger H/TT | Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ranger H/TT | Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Ranger H/TT | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | – |
| Dry | 87 | – |
| Wet | 83 | – |
| Comfort | 81 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | – |
| Handling | 81 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon Ranger H/TT is widely regarded as a high-performing, cost-effective alternative to premium tire brands, particularly for SUV owners. Users consistently praise its superior grip in both wet and dry conditions, with several reporting it as a significant upgrade over factory-fitted Continental and Pirelli options.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition
- Impressive tread longevity on heavy SUVs
- Strong performance in winter and snow conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Slightly higher road noise compared to some premium competitors
Observations
- Volvo XC90 owners report high satisfaction with both tread life and all-weather performance.
- The tire is frequently cited as a superior replacement for OEM tires on mid-to-large sized SUVs like the Freelander and XC90.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Ranger H/TT | B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 660 - 740 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon
BFGoodrich
Only Avon Ranger H/TT has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.