Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Firestone

Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO

Winter Touring tires

Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
10 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
70
Snow
60
Comfort
73
Treadwear
80
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictOnly Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
79
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTWinterhawk 2 EVO
Tyre Reviews owners – 79

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
70
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTWinterhawk 2 EVO
Tyre Reviews owners – 70

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
60
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTWinterhawk 2 EVO
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
73
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTWinterhawk 2 EVO
Tyre Reviews owners – 73

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
80
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTWinterhawk 2 EVO
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
64
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTWinterhawk 2 EVO
Tyre Reviews owners – 64

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LTFirestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
Relative Score – 72
Dry – 79
Wet – 70
Snow – 60
Comfort – 73
Treadwear – 80
Handling – 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO

The Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO is viewed as a budget-friendly winter tire that excels in tread longevity and snow performance but struggles with consistency in wet weather conditions. While some users praise its durability and value, others report significant concerns regarding traction on damp or rainy surfaces and inconsistent road noise levels.

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and durability
  • Strong performance on snow and icy surfaces
  • High value for the price point
  • Robust sidewall construction

Cons

  • Unpredictable grip on wet and damp roads
  • Tendency for wheel spin during acceleration in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent reports regarding road noise levels
  • Potential for understeer in wet weather

Observations

  • Users reported positive experiences with ride comfort and noise levels on mid-sized sedans like the Skoda Octavia.
  • The 195/65/15 size was noted for having strong sidewalls that resist deformation over multiple winter seasons.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT B · Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
Category—Winter Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10 - 11/32″—
UTQG660 - 740 B A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Firestone

Only Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
Tire B · Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.