Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Kumho Solus TA11 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

Kumho Solus TA11 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
58 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
90
Snow
80
Comfort
92
Noise
90
Treadwear
89

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictOnly Kumho Solus TA11 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Kumho Solus TA11
92
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTSolus TA11
Tire Rack owners – 88
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Kumho Solus TA11
90
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTSolus TA11
Tire Rack owners – 84
SimpleTire owners – 91

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Kumho Solus TA11
80
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTSolus TA11
Tire Rack owners – 71
SimpleTire owners – 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Kumho Solus TA11
92
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTSolus TA11
Tire Rack owners – 83
SimpleTire owners – 93

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Kumho Solus TA11
90
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTSolus TA11
SimpleTire owners – 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Kumho Solus TA11
89
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTSolus TA11
Tire Rack owners – 83
SimpleTire owners – 90

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Kumho Solus TA11: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LTKumho Solus TA11
Relative Score – 89
Dry – 92
Wet – 90
Snow – 80
Comfort – 92
Noise – 90
Treadwear – 89

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Solus TA11

The Kumho Solus TA11 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly touring tire that excels in daily commuting and highway driving. While most users praise its comfort, quiet ride, and longevity, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding performance during aggressive maneuvers or in deep snow conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable tread life and durability
  • Consistent traction in wet and dry daily driving conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity for aggressive or performance-oriented driving
  • Inconsistent performance in deep snow or winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise if not balanced correctly
  • Limited feedback and 'sloppy' handling feel for spirited drivers

Observations

  • Users with minivans and sedans (e.g., Honda Odyssey, Toyota Camry) report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
  • Drivers of heavier or more performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Ford Mustang) note that the tire lacks the sidewall stiffness required for spirited handling.
  • SUV owners note that while the tire is excellent for on-road comfort, it is not suitable for off-road or aggressive terrain use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT B · Kumho Solus TA11
Category—Premium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available118
Rim diameters16″13″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 11/32″10/32″
UTQG660 - 740 B A700 A B
Treadwear warranty—75,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 50 psi44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Kumho

Only Kumho Solus TA11 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA11

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.