Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91FV — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2

All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
65
Snow
87
Comfort
84
Noise
–
Treadwear
85
Handling
82
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
Owner ratings
Dry
87
Wet
83
Snow
74
Comfort
81
Noise
80
Treadwear
77
Handling
86
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 and Yokohama Geolandar G91FV are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 is stronger on snow, treadwear and comfort. Yokohama Geolandar G91FV is stronger on wet and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91FV leads by 1
A
86
B
87
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 83 83
Tyre Reviews owners 87 –
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91FV leads by 18
A
65
B
83
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 92 73
Tyre Reviews owners 60 –
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 leads by 13
A
87
B
74
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 87 90
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 leads by 3
A
84
B
81
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 80 68
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
80
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
SimpleTire owners 78 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 leads by 8
A
85
B
77
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
Tire Rack owners 78 79
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91FV leads by 4
A
82
B
86
Why this score
SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Geolandar G91FV
Tyre Reviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryBFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
Relative Score 80 81
Dry 86 87
Wet 65 83
Snow 87 74
Comfort 84 81
Noise – 80
Treadwear 85 77
Handling 82 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2

The BFGoodrich Mud Terrain TA KM2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and capable off-road tire that maintains surprising on-road composure for its aggressive tread pattern. While users consistently praise its longevity and exceptional traction in mud and snow, performance in wet tarmac conditions remains a significant point of contention.

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud and snow
  • Impressive tread life and overall durability
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Reliable performance under heavy towing and payload conditions

Cons

  • Poor wet weather handling and traction on tarmac
  • Tendency to develop increased road noise as the tread wears
  • Susceptibility to oversteer on twisty, wet roads

Observations

  • Heavy-duty utility vehicles like the Land Rover Defender reported excellent longevity, with some users achieving nearly 90,000 miles.
  • Users noted that the tire's performance remains consistent even when subjected to heavy towing loads of up to 3 tons.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G91FV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
CategoryAll Terrain and Off Road All Season tire—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Tread depth17 - 20/32″—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 65 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Yokohama

Too close to call: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 and Yokohama Geolandar G91FV are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 is stronger on snow, treadwear and comfort. Yokohama Geolandar G91FV is stronger on wet and handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV scores 83 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 scores 87 vs 74 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 scores 85 vs 77 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar G91FV scores 86 vs 82 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91FV
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.