Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 58 | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | 100 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 90% | 96% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 55 | 77 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | 98 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 79% | 86% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 65 | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 100 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 98% | 91% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 85% | 97% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | 78 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | 100 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 38 |
| SimpleTire owners | 77 | 98 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 82 | 100 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 80 |
| Dry | 68 | 89 |
| Wet | 67 | 83 |
| Snow | 76 | 76 |
| Comfort | 84 | 79 |
| Noise | 77 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 81 |
| Handling | 65 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 96% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -5.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 7% #14/18 · 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tyre Test | +5.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 98% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 91% #24/30 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | +7 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 97% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -12 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 94% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 90% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +3.8 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 80% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +20 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 79% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 86% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -6.9 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
- High level of driver confidence in extreme weather
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
- Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
The Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in wet, slushy, and cold dry conditions. Users consistently praise its sporty handling and confidence-inspiring grip, though it is frequently noted that the tire's performance and longevity are compromised if used in warm temperatures or during summer months.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to hydroplaning.
- Strong dry-road handling and steering precision for a winter tire.
- Excellent traction and stability in snow and slush.
- Comfortable and relatively quiet ride quality.
- Aesthetically pleasing design with effective rim protection.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly if driven in temperatures above 15°C or year-round.
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage and bubbling when encountering road hazards.
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages and tread depth decreases.
- High price point compared to some competitors.
Observations
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive performance vehicles report high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain traction and control.
- Users with staggered fitments on luxury sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, M240i) note that the tire maintains its sporty character well in cold climates.
- Some owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower setups noted that the tire's longevity is significantly reduced under aggressive driving styles.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 32 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Pirelli
Winner: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if noise and comfort matter most to you.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 87 vs 65 on handling.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 89 vs 68 on dry.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 83 vs 67 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 77 vs 62 on noise.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.