Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Crugen HT51

Kumho Crugen HT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
78
Comfort
83
Noise
87
Treadwear
73
Handling
77
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, snow and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 5
A
80
B
85
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 88
Tire Rack owners 75 89
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners 93 97

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 17
A
70
B
87
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 92
Tire Rack owners 72 81
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners 93 94

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 16
A
62
B
78
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 91
Tire Rack owners 84 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 60
SimpleTire owners 60 92

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 2
A
81
B
83
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 94
Tire Rack owners 65 83
Tyre Reviews owners – 67
SimpleTire owners 87 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 4
A
83
B
87
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 87
SimpleTire owners 87 94

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 7
A
66
B
73
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Tire Rack owners 83 87
Tyre Reviews owners – 73
SimpleTire owners 87 95

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Duravis M700 HD leads by 3
A
80
B
77
Why this score
SourceDuravis M700 HDCrugen HT51
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Scores at a glance

CategoryBridgestone Duravis M700 HDKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 73 81
Dry 80 85
Wet 70 87
Snow 62 78
Comfort 81 83
Noise 83 87
Treadwear 66 73
Handling 80 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Crugen HT51

The Kumho Crugen H/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile highway tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction comparable to premium competitors. While users appreciate its fuel efficiency and handling characteristics, long-term ownership experiences are polarized by reports of uneven tread wear and significant noise degradation over time.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Positive impact on fuel economy
  • Quiet highway performance during early stages of ownership

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature or uneven shoulder wear
  • Limited capability in deep mud or severe winter conditions
  • Noise levels becoming intrusive between 45-55 mph

Observations

  • Users operating heavy-duty trucks like the Ram 1500 report stable handling and good wet-weather confidence.
  • Owners of SUVs like the 4Runner note that while the tire performs well for highway and light off-road use, it is susceptible to shoulder wear patterns.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Sizes available744
Rim diameters16″ – 17″15″ – 22″
Tread depth15/32″12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure80 psi50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, snow and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 78 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 85 vs 80 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Duravis M700 HD
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.