Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Kumho Crugen HT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
78
Comfort
83
Noise
87
Treadwear
73
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Crugen HT51 if snow and wet matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Duravis R500 HD leads by 8
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
93
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
85
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 88
Tire Rack owners 78 89
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 97

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
75
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 92
Tire Rack owners 71 81
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 94

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
62
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
78
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 91
Tire Rack owners 92 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 60
SimpleTire owners – 92

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Duravis R500 HD leads by 6
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
89
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
83
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 94
Tire Rack owners 65 83
Tyre Reviews owners – 67
SimpleTire owners – 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Duravis R500 HD leads by 7
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
94
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 87
SimpleTire owners – 94

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Duravis R500 HD leads by 25
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
98
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
73
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Tire Rack owners 89 87
Tyre Reviews owners – 73
SimpleTire owners – 95

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Duravis R500 HD leads by 15
A — Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
92
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
77
Why this score
SourceDuravis R500 HDCrugen HT51
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Duravis R500 HDKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 86 81
Dry 93 85
Wet 75 87
Snow 62 78
Comfort 89 83
Noise 94 87
Treadwear 98 73
Handling 92 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Crugen HT51

The Kumho Crugen H/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile highway tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction comparable to premium competitors. While users appreciate its fuel efficiency and handling characteristics, long-term ownership experiences are polarized by reports of uneven tread wear and significant noise degradation over time.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Positive impact on fuel economy
  • Quiet highway performance during early stages of ownership

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature or uneven shoulder wear
  • Limited capability in deep mud or severe winter conditions
  • Noise levels becoming intrusive between 45-55 mph

Observations

  • Users operating heavy-duty trucks like the Ram 1500 report stable handling and good wet-weather confidence.
  • Owners of SUVs like the 4Runner note that while the tire performs well for highway and light off-road use, it is susceptible to shoulder wear patterns.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Kumho

Winner: Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Crugen HT51 if snow and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD scores 98 vs 73 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 78 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD scores 92 vs 77 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 75 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.