81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 vs Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM22 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM22 | Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM22 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM22 | Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM22 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM22 | Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 84 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM22 leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM22 | Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 50 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP001S leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM22 | Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 43 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 | Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 73 |
| Dry | 83 | 82 |
| Wet | 97 | 82 |
| Comfort | 87 | 84 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 50 |
| Handling | 43 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 receives highly polarized feedback, with performance heavily dependent on vehicle drivetrain and specific winter conditions. While some users report exceptional traction in deep snow and severe winter environments, others experience significant instability, particularly on rear-wheel-drive platforms.
Pros
- Exceptional deep snow and ice traction
- High confidence in severe winter weather conditions
- Strong grip performance on lighter vehicles
Cons
- Poor performance in warmer temperatures leading to rapid tread wear
- Increased road noise at moderate temperatures
- Inconsistent handling characteristics on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Observations
- All-wheel-drive vehicles, particularly heavy sedans, report superior stability and traction in extreme snow.
- Rear-wheel-drive luxury sedans may experience significant traction loss, suggesting the tire is less suited for RWD configurations in icy conditions.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S receives a polarized reception from users, with performance feedback ranging from excellent grip to significant dissatisfaction regarding longevity. While some drivers appreciate the tire's handling capabilities, a recurring theme of premature and uneven tread wear suggests inconsistent performance across different vehicle applications.
Pros
- Strong grip performance in both wet and dry road conditions
- Improved tread longevity compared to some previous tire brands
- Effective fuel efficiency characteristics
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Reports of uneven wear patterns
- Lower initial tread depth compared to industry standards
- Inconsistent handling performance leading to a lack of driver confidence
Observations
- Users operating these tires on light commercial vehicles, such as the Peugeot Bipper, reported significantly reduced lifespan and uneven wear.
- Drivers of hybrid vehicles expressed frustration with the tire's traction, noting a lack of confidence in various weather conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 | B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Bridgestone
73
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S scores 80 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 scores 83 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 scores 97 vs 82 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 scores 87 vs 84 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM22
Tire B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.