67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better noise, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 76 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 93 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 95 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 77 |
| Dry | 70 | 75 |
| Wet | 71 | 77 |
| Snow | 61 | 79 |
| Comfort | 72 | 77 |
| Noise | 71 | 95 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 72 |
| Handling | 64 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S is generally regarded as a highly capable all-season tire, particularly praised for its impressive performance in wet, cold, and snowy conditions. While many users report excellent traction and safety in adverse weather, the tire receives mixed feedback regarding its tread longevity and consistency in dry-weather handling.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Reliable emergency braking performance on slick surfaces
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
- Increased road noise noted by some users
Observations
- Users of compact SUVs, such as the Honda CR-V, have reported significantly lower tread life than expected for the vehicle class.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Civic Type R, noted a trade-off in lateral grip and steering feedback when switching from dedicated summer tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Bridgestone
77
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better noise, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 95 vs 71 on noise.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 79 vs 61 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 77 vs 71 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 also compared with
Hankook Kinergy 4S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.