Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 1 review
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Ecopia EP600 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison76Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online – 84 -
–
Wet
No comparison74Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 69 Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Comfort
No comparison67Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 66 Reviews found online – 68 -
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison62Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 53 Reviews found online – 76 -
–
Handling
No comparison82Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online – 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP600 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 73 |
| Dry | – | 76 |
| Wet | – | 74 |
| Comfort | – | 67 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | – | 62 |
| Handling | – | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Ecopia EP600
73
/ 100
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP600
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP600 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Bridgestone Ecopia EP600
73
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Only Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP600
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.