Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT vs Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 83 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 77 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 49 | 63 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 56 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 84 |
| Wet | 63 | 78 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 54 | 65 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 74 | 57 |
| Handling | 66 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT is a polarizing run-flat tire that excels in longevity and dry-road steering feedback but frequently draws criticism for its harsh ride quality and inconsistent wet-weather performance. While many users appreciate its durability and ability to handle road hazards, a significant portion of owners report high noise levels and a lack of confidence in damp or wet conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
- Strong dry-road grip
- Reliable run-flat safety performance
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
- Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
- Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
Observations
- Users with BMW M-performance models frequently report that the tire's stiff sidewall compromises the vehicle's intended handling balance and comfort.
- Drivers of 18-inch and 19-inch low-profile setups report the most significant complaints regarding ride harshness and vulnerability to pothole damage.
- Owners of vehicles with S-Line or M-Sport suspension setups sometimes find the tire's stiffness acceptable, as it aligns with the vehicle's inherently firm factory tuning.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT receives mixed feedback, often praised for its initial comfort and steering precision but frequently criticized for premature tread wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages. While many users appreciate its performance as a touring tire, the run-flat construction appears to be a polarizing feature that significantly impacts long-term ride quality and durability.
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
- Low noise levels when new
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
- Harsh ride quality compared to non-run-flat alternatives
Observations
- BMW 3-series owners report a notable decline in ride quality and noise levels as the tires approach the end of their service life.
- Lexus UX owners have reported extreme cabin noise levels, suggesting the tire's acoustic profile may be poorly suited to certain vehicle chassis.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT | B · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 14 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT if treadwear matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 74 vs 57 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT scores 78 vs 63 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT scores 76 vs 66 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.