67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
79 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT vs Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza S001 RFT leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 67 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Azenis FK453 Runflat leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 49 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza S001 RFT leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Azenis FK453 Runflat leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 RFT | Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 65 |
| Dry | 76 | 67 |
| Wet | 63 | 63 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 54 | 70 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 74 | 60 |
| Handling | 66 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
65
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT is a polarizing run-flat tire that excels in longevity and dry-road steering feedback but frequently draws criticism for its harsh ride quality and inconsistent wet-weather performance. While many users appreciate its durability and ability to handle road hazards, a significant portion of owners report high noise levels and a lack of confidence in damp or wet conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
- Strong dry-road grip
- Reliable run-flat safety performance
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
- Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
- Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
Observations
- Users with BMW M-performance models frequently report that the tire's stiff sidewall compromises the vehicle's intended handling balance and comfort.
- Drivers of 18-inch and 19-inch low-profile setups report the most significant complaints regarding ride harshness and vulnerability to pothole damage.
- Owners of vehicles with S-Line or M-Sport suspension setups sometimes find the tire's stiffness acceptable, as it aligns with the vehicle's inherently firm factory tuning.
The Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat receives a mixed reception, with users divided between its value as a mid-range alternative to premium run-flats and concerns regarding its longevity. While many appreciate its dry handling capabilities and competitive pricing, the tire's performance in wet conditions and inconsistent tread life remain significant points of contention.
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
- Satisfactory road feedback for daily driving
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
- Discrepancy between advertised wet-weather ratings and real-world performance
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted Bridgestone run-flats noted a reduction in road noise.
- Spirited driving styles appear to significantly impact the longevity of the tire, leading to polarized experiences regarding tread durability.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT | B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 14 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Bridgestone
65
/ 100
Falken
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat scores 70 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 74 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 76 vs 67 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat scores 70 vs 66 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT also compared with
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.