70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza S007 vs Nexen N2000 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N2000 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S007 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza S007 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N2000 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 76 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N2000 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N2000 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza S007 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007 | Nexen N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 77 |
| Dry | 85 | 82 |
| Wet | 74 | 76 |
| Comfort | 67 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 82 |
| Handling | 72 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S007 is a polarizing ultra-high-performance tire that excels in aggressive, dry-weather driving but receives inconsistent feedback regarding wet-weather safety and longevity. While owners of high-performance vehicles often praise its grip and track-day capabilities, others report significant issues with rapid tread wear and poor performance in standing water.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
- Strong performance during spirited driving and track-day use
- Aesthetically pleasing design with a comfortable ride for a low-profile tire
- Effective as original equipment (OE) on specific performance models
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding hydroplaning and safety in wet or damp conditions
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them louder than expected
- Stiff sidewall construction can lead to a harsh ride on uneven surfaces
Observations
- Users with high-horsepower rear-wheel-drive vehicles report excellent traction when tires are properly warmed in dry conditions.
- Owners of heavier sedans or non-dedicated sports cars have reported premature wear, with some noting the tire is specifically engineered for specialized performance chassis rather than general luxury use.
- The tire is frequently noted as a stiff-riding option, which can exacerbate the ride quality of vehicles already equipped with firm factory suspensions.
The Nexen N2000 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that offers impressive performance for its price point. While many users praise its dry grip and longevity, consensus is divided regarding its wet-weather performance and noise levels as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money
- Strong dry road grip and handling feedback
- Surprisingly durable tread life for many users
- Unexpectedly capable performance in light snow conditions
Cons
- Significant decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth decreases
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality reported by some users
- Potential for uneven wear patterns if not properly maintained
- Aquaplaning concerns in heavy rain
Observations
- Users operating smaller hatchbacks like the Renault Clio and Vauxhall Corsa report high satisfaction with longevity and value.
- Proper inflation pressure (e.g., 40 PSI) may mitigate reports of uneven wear on certain vehicle applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007 | B · Nexen N2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Bridgestone
77
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N2000 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S007 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N2000 scores 82 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N2000 scores 77 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza S007 scores 72 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza S007 scores 85 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S007
Tire B · Nexen N2000
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza S007 also compared with
Nexen N2000 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.