82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
69/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
80/100
36 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
67/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Zeon 4XS Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 78 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 85% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 79 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 82% | 84% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 97% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 66 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 54 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 63 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 67 |
| Dry | 75 | 77 |
| Wet | 73 | 70 |
| Snow | 71 | – |
| Comfort | 93 | 66 |
| Noise | 90 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 54 |
| Handling | 80 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 85% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 93% #9/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | -8.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 99% #4/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 89% #6/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 3% #29/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | +9.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 84% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 92% #10/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -8.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 84% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 97% #5/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +3.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is widely regarded as a durable, high-mileage tire that excels in dry and wet road conditions while offering respectable light off-road capability. While many users praise its quiet ride and longevity, some report a noticeable decline in comfort and increased noise levels in cold temperatures or on rougher road surfaces.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Strong traction on dry and wet pavement
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on standard roads
- Capable performance on light off-road surfaces like gravel and sand
Cons
- Harsh ride and increased noise on rough or damaged road surfaces
- Poor performance in deep snow and icy conditions
- Stiff sidewalls can feel uncomfortable at low speeds
- Limited effectiveness in deep mud
Observations
- Users with SUVs like the Peugeot 3008 and 5008 report the tire is well-suited for highway and town driving but can feel harsh on uneven terrain.
- Pickup truck owners, such as those with the Nissan Navara, frequently highlight the tire's impressive durability and high-mileage lifespan under heavier loads.
- Drivers of high-torque vehicles noted improved traction and reduced wheel spin compared to OEM alternatives like the Bridgestone Dueler H/T.
The Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport is generally regarded as a high-performance SUV tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering impressive noise suppression and ride comfort. While many users praise its handling characteristics, there is a consistent consensus regarding its accelerated tread wear and occasional reports of manufacturing inconsistencies.
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and braking performance
- Superior cabin quietness and low road noise
- Strong dry grip and confident handling on winding roads
- High level of ride comfort suitable for premium SUVs
Cons
- Faster than average tread wear rates
- Reports of vibration issues potentially linked to balancing or manufacturing defects
- Perceived lack of sidewall stiffness under heavy cornering loads
Observations
- Users driving premium SUVs, such as the Mercedes GLC, highlight the tire's quietness as a standout feature.
- Drivers on rural, winding roads report high confidence in braking and cornering stability.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
67
/ 100
Cooper
Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 86 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 93 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 80 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 90 vs 80 on noise.
Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 also compared with
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.