Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter vs Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolander A/T G015

All Season Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
Owner ratings
Dry
76
Wet
93
Snow
95
Comfort
87
Treadwear
63
Handling
53

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact Winter and Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact Winter is stronger on handling and dry. Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 is stronger on comfort and wet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact Winter leads by 7
A — Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
83
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
76
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact WinterGeolander A/T G015
Tyre Reviews owners 83 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolander A/T G015 leads by 13
A — Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
80
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
93
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact WinterGeolander A/T G015
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
–
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
95

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolander A/T G015 leads by 14
A — Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
73
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
87
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact WinterGeolander A/T G015
Tyre Reviews owners 73 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact Winter leads by 2
A — Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
65
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
63
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact WinterGeolander A/T G015
Tyre Reviews owners 65 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact Winter leads by 25
A — Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
78
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
53
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact WinterGeolander A/T G015
Tyre Reviews owners 78 –

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter vs Yokohama Geolander A/T G015: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact WinterYokohama Geolander A/T G015
Relative Score 75 75
Dry 83 76
Wet 80 93
Snow – 95
Comfort 73 87
Treadwear 65 63
Handling 78 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiCrossContact Winter

The Continental ContiCrossContact Winter receives polarized feedback, with users split between high praise for its snow and dry-road performance and significant criticism regarding its longevity and wet-weather handling. While some drivers find it to be a quiet and capable all-weather performer, others report concerns regarding fuel efficiency and traction in mud or heavy rain.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking performance in snow conditions
  • Surprisingly quiet and stable on dry pavement
  • Strong grip during spirited driving on winding roads
  • Versatile performance that some users find suitable for year-round use

Cons

  • Poor resistance to aquaplaning in wet conditions
  • Short tread life compared to premium competitors
  • Negative impact on fuel consumption
  • Inadequate performance in deep mud

Observations

  • Users noted a significant disparity in tread longevity, with some reporting premature wear at 30,000 km compared to expectations of 60,000+ km.
  • The tire is perceived as a viable alternative to summer-biased tires for drivers in regions with mild winters, provided they prioritize dry-road comfort.
Tire B Yokohama Geolander A/T G015

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact Winter B · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Too close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact Winter and Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact Winter is stronger on handling and dry. Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 is stronger on comfort and wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter scores 78 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 scores 87 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 scores 93 vs 80 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter scores 83 vs 76 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.