Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone DriveGuard vs Continental ContiProContact SSR — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone DriveGuard

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone DriveGuard tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
26 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
83
Snow
–
Comfort
69
Noise
–
Treadwear
47
Handling
74
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone DriveGuard and Continental ContiProContact SSR are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone DriveGuard is stronger on wet, comfort and dry. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DriveGuard leads by 3
A
84
B
81
Why this score
SourceDriveGuardContiProContact SSR
Tire Rack owners – 85
Tyre Reviews owners 84 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DriveGuard leads by 12
A
83
B
71
Why this score
SourceDriveGuardContiProContact SSR
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 83 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
52
Why this score
SourceDriveGuardContiProContact SSR
Tire Rack owners – 59

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DriveGuard leads by 8
A
69
B
61
Why this score
SourceDriveGuardContiProContact SSR
Tire Rack owners – 69
Tyre Reviews owners 69 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
61

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiProContact SSR leads by 15
A
47
B
62
Why this score
SourceDriveGuardContiProContact SSR
Tire Rack owners – 67
Tyre Reviews owners 47 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiProContact SSR leads by 6
A
74
B
80
Why this score
SourceDriveGuardContiProContact SSR
Tyre Reviews owners 74 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryBridgestone DriveGuardContinental ContiProContact SSR
Relative Score 70 70
Dry 84 81
Wet 83 71
Snow – 52
Comfort 69 61
Noise – 61
Treadwear 47 62
Handling 74 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone DriveGuard

The Bridgestone DriveGuard is a polarizing run-flat tire that excels in ride comfort and wet-weather grip compared to traditional run-flat alternatives. However, it is frequently criticized for premature tread wear and a tendency to become noisier as the tire ages, leading to mixed long-term satisfaction among users.

Pros

  • Superior ride comfort for a run-flat tire
  • Excellent wet and dry road grip
  • Noticeable noise reduction compared to factory-fitted run-flats
  • Confidence-inspiring handling and stability

Cons

  • Extremely rapid tread wear (often reported between 6,000 and 13,000 miles)
  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down
  • Poor performance in snow and near-freezing temperatures
  • Handling degradation (tram-lining and wandering) as tread depth decreases

Observations

  • BMW owners frequently report rapid inner-edge wear, suggesting the tire may be sensitive to specific suspension geometries or alignment settings.
  • Users transitioning from stiffer factory-fitted run-flats (like the Potenza S001) on vehicles like the Mini and Honda Civic report a significant improvement in ride quality.
Tire B Continental ContiProContact SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone DriveGuard B · Continental ContiProContact SSR
CategorySummer Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—400 A A
Treadwear warranty—40,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Continental

Too close to call: Bridgestone DriveGuard and Continental ContiProContact SSR are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone DriveGuard is stronger on wet, comfort and dry. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on treadwear and handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 62 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone DriveGuard scores 83 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone DriveGuard scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 80 vs 74 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone DriveGuard
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiProContact SSR
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.