Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ContiProContact vs Goodyear Eagle LS — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Goodyear Eagle LS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
38/100
Owner ratings
Dry
69
Wet
58
Snow
42
Comfort
65
Noise
63
Treadwear
57
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictOnly Goodyear Eagle LS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
69
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEagle LS
Tire Rack owners 80 69
SimpleTire owners 96 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
58
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEagle LS
Tire Rack owners 73 58
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
42
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEagle LS
Tire Rack owners 51 42
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
65
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEagle LS
Tire Rack owners 75 65
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
63
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEagle LS
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
57
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEagle LS
Tire Rack owners 63 57
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiProContact
–
B — Goodyear Eagle LS
68

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiProContact vs Goodyear Eagle LS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContactGoodyear Eagle LS
Relative Score – 60
Dry – 69
Wet – 58
Snow – 42
Comfort – 65
Noise – 63
Treadwear – 57
Handling – 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Goodyear Eagle LS
Sizes available56—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Only Goodyear Eagle LS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle LS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.