Skip to content
Head-to-head

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — Compared

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 1
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
83
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
84
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SSREagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners 88 89

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 SSR leads by 4
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
75
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
71
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SSREagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners 82 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 7
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
56
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
63
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SSREagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners 70 74

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 5
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
56
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
61

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 16
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
31
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
47
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5 SSREagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners 56 63

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 2
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
82
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
84

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5 SSRGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Relative Score 62 66
Dry 83 84
Wet 75 71
Comfort 56 63
Noise 56 61
Treadwear 31 47
Handling 82 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Sizes available16—
Rim diameters17″ – 20″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 47 vs 31 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 63 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 61 vs 56 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR scores 75 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.