Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Continental ContiSportContact 5 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport

Ultra High Performance Summer tire

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
77
Comfort
78
Noise
–
Treadwear
63
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force Sport leads by 5
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
88
B — Continental ContiSportContact 5
83
Why this score
Sourceg-Force SportContiSportContact 5
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 88 –
SimpleTire owners – 99

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force Sport leads by 3
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
77
B — Continental ContiSportContact 5
74
Why this score
Sourceg-Force SportContiSportContact 5
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –
SimpleTire owners – 98

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force Sport leads by 4
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
78
B — Continental ContiSportContact 5
74
Why this score
Sourceg-Force SportContiSportContact 5
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 78 –
SimpleTire owners – 97

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
–
B — Continental ContiSportContact 5
72
Why this score
Sourceg-Force SportContiSportContact 5
SimpleTire owners – 98

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force Sport leads by 18
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
63
B — Continental ContiSportContact 5
45
Why this score
Sourceg-Force SportContiSportContact 5
Tire Rack owners – 56
Tyre Reviews owners 63 –
SimpleTire owners – 92

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 leads by 6
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
77
B — Continental ContiSportContact 5
83
Why this score
Sourceg-Force SportContiSportContact 5
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport vs Continental ContiSportContact 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force SportContinental ContiSportContact 5
Relative Score 75 69
Dry 88 83
Wet 77 74
Comfort 78 74
Noise – 72
Treadwear 63 45
Handling 77 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force Sport

The BFGoodrich g-Force Sport is generally regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire that offers a significant upgrade over stock factory equipment. While users praise its dry grip and sporty handling characteristics, there is a notable divide regarding its longevity and wet-weather performance.

Pros

  • Excellent dry surface grip and handling
  • High value-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet operation compared to factory tires
  • Robust sidewall construction

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions
  • Potential for premature degradation

Observations

  • Users transitioning from standard touring tires (such as Bridgestone Turanza or Goodyear stock tires) report a marked improvement in sporty driving dynamics.
  • The tire is perceived as capable enough for entry-level track use, suggesting a stiffer construction suitable for spirited driving.
Tire B Continental ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport B · Continental ContiSportContact 5
CategoryUltra High Performance Summer tire—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available—30
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth—8 - 10/32″
UTQG—280 - 420 A - AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Continental

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 63 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 83 vs 77 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 88 vs 83 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport scores 78 vs 74 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport
Tire B · Continental ContiSportContact 5

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.