63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Continental CrossContact UHP — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
34 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact UHP — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossContact UHP leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX Sport | CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | 97 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossContact UHP leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX Sport | CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX Sport | CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 60 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX Sport | CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 72 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | 97 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact UHP leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX Sport | CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 39 | 53 |
| SimpleTire owners | 81 | 92 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact UHP leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX Sport | CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 74 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX Sport | Continental CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 71 |
| Dry | 77 | 86 |
| Wet | 70 | 79 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 41 | 53 |
| Handling | 64 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX Sport receives a polarized reception, characterized by high praise for its dry-road handling and off-road capability, contrasted sharply by widespread frustration regarding premature tread wear. While some users appreciate its quiet ride and versatile performance, a significant portion of owners report unacceptable longevity, often requiring replacement well before the 20,000-mile mark.
Pros
- Strong dry-road handling and steering response
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Effective traction in light off-road and muddy conditions
- Reliable performance in varied seasonal weather for some users
Cons
- Extremely rapid and inconsistent tread wear
- Poor wet-weather performance and susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Lack of a mileage warranty leading to high long-term ownership costs
- Reported structural issues including sidewall cracking and premature rubber degradation
Observations
- Owners of heavier SUVs, such as the Volvo XC90 and Land Rover Discovery Sport, report the most severe tread wear issues, suggesting the tire may struggle with the weight of larger vehicles.
- Performance-oriented SUV drivers, such as those with the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, generally appreciate the handling characteristics but note that the tire is not a substitute for dedicated summer or winter rubber.
The Continental Cross Contact UHP is a polarizing tire that delivers strong dry and wet road performance but suffers from significant inconsistency regarding tread longevity. While many users praise its handling, stability, and confidence-inspiring grip, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature and uneven wear, particularly on heavier SUVs and 4x4 vehicles.
Pros
- Strong dry and wet road grip
- Predictable handling and cornering stability
- Good performance in light snow and varied weather conditions
- Quiet operation on many vehicle platforms
Cons
- Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- High road noise reported by a significant subset of users
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality
- Poor off-road capability, particularly on wet grass or mud
Observations
- Heavy SUVs and 4x4s frequently exhibit rapid front-axle tire wear, often requiring rotation as early as 8,000-10,000 miles to maintain even tread depth.
- Users with high-center-of-gravity vehicles report that aggressive cornering significantly accelerates rear tire scrubbing.
- Performance varies notably by vehicle weight; lighter or more balanced setups report significantly higher mileage than heavy luxury SUVs.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport | B · Continental CrossContact UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 32 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 280 - 420 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Continental
71
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental CrossContact UHP — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 53 vs 41 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 86 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Tire B · Continental CrossContact UHP
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX Sport also compared with
Continental CrossContact UHP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.