74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
69/100
91 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental Eco Contact 5 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
G Fit EQ+ leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G Fit EQ+ leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G Fit EQ+ leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
G Fit EQ+ leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G Fit EQ+ leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact 5 | G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact 5 | Laufenn G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 86 |
| Dry | 77 | 87 |
| Wet | 77 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 68 | 79 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 90 |
| Handling | 69 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
86
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 14% #7/16 · 2022 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 15 Inch | -1.8 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental EcoContact 5 is a polarizing tire that excels in fuel efficiency and longevity but receives significant criticism for its wet-weather performance and road noise. While many users praise its low rolling resistance and durability, a substantial portion of the user base reports poor traction in wet conditions and high noise levels on coarse road surfaces.
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- High tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and predictable dry-weather handling
- Consistent performance across a wide range of vehicle types
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and increased risk of aquaplaning
- High road noise on coarse or uneven asphalt
- Thin sidewalls prone to bulging or damage from potholes
- Performance degradation as tread depth decreases
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiat 500, Renault Clio) frequently reported issues with wet-weather traction and wheel spin.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines noted that the tire's performance in the wet was particularly underwhelming during acceleration.
- Owners of vehicles with 17-inch or larger wheels reported higher sensitivity to road noise and surface imperfections.
The Laufenn G Fit EQ+ is widely regarded as a high-value tire that delivers reliable performance across both wet and dry road conditions. Users consistently praise its balanced handling and affordability, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious drivers seeking dependable daily performance.
Pros
- Excellent grip and stability on wet surfaces
- Strong performance in dry conditions
- High value-for-money proposition
- Consistent reliability for daily driving
Cons
- Higher than average road noise levels
- Moderate tread longevity
Observations
- Users report satisfactory performance in tropical climates, specifically noting stability in heavy rain environments.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact 5 | B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Continental
86
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 90 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 83 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 79 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 87 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Continental Eco Contact 5
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Eco Contact 5 also compared with
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.