65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
80/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
58/100
153 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Firestone Firehawk 900 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 78 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental EcoContact 6 | Firestone Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 84 |
| Dry | 84 | 78 |
| Wet | 67 | 80 |
| Comfort | 69 | 90 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 51 | 88 |
| Handling | 60 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental EcoContact 6 is a polarizing tire that prioritizes fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance at the expense of longevity and wet-weather performance. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and contribution to fuel economy, a significant number of owners report rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and a lack of confidence-inspiring handling, particularly when fitted as original equipment on modern vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Stable and predictable performance on dry, well-maintained roads
- Good initial road feedback for daily commuting
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Poor wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Low initial tread depth (often reported at 6.0-6.5mm) compared to industry standards
- Weak sidewall construction prone to punctures and bulging
- Inconsistent performance as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, particularly EVs and PHEVs, report significantly accelerated tread wear and concerns regarding sidewall durability.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or higher-torque vehicles frequently note that the tire's soft compound struggles to manage power, leading to excessive wheel spin and understeer.
- Owners of compact SUVs and crossovers frequently cite issues with stone punctures, suggesting the tread pattern or carcass design is ill-suited for anything beyond pristine asphalt.
The Firestone Firehawk 900 is generally regarded as a reliable, balanced tire that offers commendable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its durability and comfort over rough road surfaces, the consensus is frequently tempered by reports of significant road noise, particularly with run-flat variants.
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Observations
- Users operating on poor road infrastructure report high satisfaction with the tire's structural integrity.
- Owners of premium vehicles like the Audi TT have reported dissatisfaction with noise levels when using run-flat versions of this tire.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental EcoContact 6 | B · Firestone Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental
84
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 88 vs 51 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 85 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 90 vs 69 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 80 vs 67 on wet.
Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk 900
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental EcoContact 6 also compared with
Firestone Firehawk 900 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.