65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
80/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
58/100
153 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
62/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
77/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental EcoContact 6 and Yokohama BluEarth RV02 are within 2 points overall. Continental EcoContact 6 is stronger on dry and comfort. Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is stronger on handling, wet and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 50
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 83 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 93% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth RV02 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 81 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 84% | 95% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 100% | 97% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 26 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth RV02 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth RV02 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental EcoContact 6 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 64 |
| Dry | 84 | 34 |
| Wet | 67 | 84 |
| Comfort | 69 | 50 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 51 | 59 |
| Handling | 60 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #12/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | +5.4 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #3/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | 92% #5/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | -5.3 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 81% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 80% #8/12 · 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | 13% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 88% #10/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | 94% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | -6.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 84% #8/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | 95% #7/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | -11.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% #21/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | +3.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental EcoContact 6 is a polarizing tire that prioritizes fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance at the expense of longevity and wet-weather performance. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and contribution to fuel economy, a significant number of owners report rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and a lack of confidence-inspiring handling, particularly when fitted as original equipment on modern vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Stable and predictable performance on dry, well-maintained roads
- Good initial road feedback for daily commuting
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Poor wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Low initial tread depth (often reported at 6.0-6.5mm) compared to industry standards
- Weak sidewall construction prone to punctures and bulging
- Inconsistent performance as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, particularly EVs and PHEVs, report significantly accelerated tread wear and concerns regarding sidewall durability.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or higher-torque vehicles frequently note that the tire's soft compound struggles to manage power, leading to excessive wheel spin and understeer.
- Owners of compact SUVs and crossovers frequently cite issues with stone punctures, suggesting the tread pattern or carcass design is ill-suited for anything beyond pristine asphalt.
The Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is widely regarded as a high-comfort, stable tire specifically engineered for MPVs and SUVs with higher centers of gravity. While users consistently praise its superior wet-weather grip and noise suppression, long-term satisfaction is somewhat tempered by reports of inconsistent tread longevity and potential material degradation over time.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
- Competitive fuel efficiency
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Observations
- Users specifically noted that the tire significantly improves stability and reduces body roll in MPVs like the Toyota Vellfire.
- Drivers of SUVs, such as the Hyundai Tucson and Nissan Qashqai, reported a marked improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence compared to OEM tire options.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental EcoContact 6 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Continental EcoContact 6 and Yokohama BluEarth RV02 are within 2 points overall. Continental EcoContact 6 is stronger on dry and comfort. Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is stronger on handling, wet and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 84 vs 34 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 80 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 69 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 84 vs 67 on wet.
Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental EcoContact 6 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.