Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Yokohama Advan S4 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan S4

Summer High Performance tires

Yokohama Advan S4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
60
Wet
30
Snow
–
Comfort
50
Treadwear
85
Handling
60

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 23
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
83
B — Yokohama Advan S4
60
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Advan S4
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 60

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 61
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
91
B — Yokohama Advan S4
30
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Advan S4
Professional tests (TWG score) 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 30

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
67
B — Yokohama Advan S4
–
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Advan S4
Professional tests (TWG score) 62 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 39
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
89
B — Yokohama Advan S4
50
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Advan S4
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 50

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
85
B — Yokohama Advan S4
85
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Advan S4
Tyre Reviews owners 68 85

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 24
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
84
B — Yokohama Advan S4
60
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06Advan S4
Tyre Reviews owners 84 60

Scores at a glance

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Yokohama Advan S4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06Yokohama Advan S4
Relative Score 87 57
Dry 83 60
Wet 91 30
Snow 67 –
Comfort 89 50
Treadwear 85 85
Handling 84 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama Advan S4

The Yokohama Advan S4 is widely regarded by users as a disappointing all-season tire that fails to deliver adequate performance in both dry and wet conditions. Owners frequently report significant issues with handling, specifically noting poor traction and a lack of confidence in inclement weather, including snow.

Pros

  • Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
  • Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure

Cons

  • Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
  • Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
  • Harsh ride quality when tire pressures are increased to compensate for handling issues

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's handling deficiencies, particularly understeer, often necessitate vehicle suspension modifications like a stiffer rear sway bar.
  • Increasing tire pressure to 38psi front and 34psi rear improves turn-in response but negatively impacts ride comfort over road imperfections.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 B · Yokohama Advan S4
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG560 A - AA A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 91 vs 30 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 89 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 84 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 83 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Tire B · Yokohama Advan S4

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.