Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Yokohama AS430 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama AS430

All Season High Performance tires

Yokohama AS430 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
4 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
75
Snow
–
Comfort
83
Treadwear
63
Handling
50

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AS430 leads by 2
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
83
B — Yokohama AS430
85
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06AS430
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 85

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 16
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
91
B — Yokohama AS430
75
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06AS430
Professional tests (TWG score) 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 75

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
67
B — Yokohama AS430
–
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06AS430
Professional tests (TWG score) 62 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 6
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
89
B — Yokohama AS430
83
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06AS430
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 22
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
85
B — Yokohama AS430
63
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06AS430
Tyre Reviews owners 68 63

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 34
A — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
84
B — Yokohama AS430
50
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact DWS 06AS430
Tyre Reviews owners 84 50

Scores at a glance

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Yokohama AS430: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06Yokohama AS430
Relative Score 87 71
Dry 83 85
Wet 91 75
Snow 67 –
Comfort 89 83
Treadwear 85 63
Handling 84 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama AS430

The Yokohama AS430 receives a polarized reception from users, with experiences ranging from high satisfaction regarding noise levels and wet-weather traction to significant disappointment regarding tread longevity. While some drivers praise its balanced performance in varied conditions, others report premature wear that falls short of expectations for the tire's class.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry surface grip
  • Surprisingly quiet ride quality
  • Reliable performance in rainy climates

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent durability across different driving styles
  • Lack of longevity compared to premium competitors

Observations

  • Users driving compact sedans like the Mazda3 reported dissatisfaction with the tire's longevity, noting a loss of grip after approximately 25,000 miles.
  • Performance-oriented drivers noted the tire's capability in diverse conditions, though long-term wear remains a point of contention.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 B · Yokohama AS430
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG560 A - AA A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 84 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 85 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 91 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 89 vs 83 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Tire B · Yokohama AS430

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.