Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ProContact GX vs Yokohama Geolandar G91F — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar G91F tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
28/100
Owner ratings
Dry
78
Wet
65
Snow
43
Comfort
73
Noise
72
Treadwear
64
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ProContact GX — better snow, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G91F if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact GX
78
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
78
Why this score
SourceProContact GXGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 78 71

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ProContact GX leads by 13
A — Continental ProContact GX
78
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
65
Why this score
SourceProContact GXGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 78 62

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ProContact GX leads by 20
A — Continental ProContact GX
63
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
43
Why this score
SourceProContact GXGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 63 82

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ProContact GX leads by 3
A — Continental ProContact GX
76
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
73
Why this score
SourceProContact GXGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 76 47

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact GX
–
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
72

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91F leads by 11
A — Continental ProContact GX
53
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
64
Why this score
SourceProContact GXGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 53 77

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact GX
–
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
75

Scores at a glance

Continental ProContact GX vs Yokohama Geolandar G91F: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContact GXYokohama Geolandar G91F
Relative Score 69 65
Dry 78 78
Wet 78 65
Snow 63 43
Comfort 76 73
Noise – 72
Treadwear 53 64
Handling – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact GX B · Yokohama Geolandar G91F
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Winner: Continental ProContact GX — better snow, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G91F if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ProContact GX scores 63 vs 43 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ProContact GX scores 78 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar G91F scores 64 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ProContact GX scores 76 vs 73 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ProContact GX
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91F

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.