Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Continental

Continental PureContact LS

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Continental PureContact LS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
79
Snow
48
Comfort
58
Treadwear
70
Handling
85
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Continental PureContact LS if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Long Trail T/A Tour leads by 1
A
87
B
86
Why this score
SourceLong Trail T/A TourPureContact LS
Tyre Reviews owners 87 86

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 9
A
70
B
79
Why this score
SourceLong Trail T/A TourPureContact LS
Tyre Reviews owners 70 79

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
48
Why this score
SourceLong Trail T/A TourPureContact LS
Tyre Reviews owners – 48

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Long Trail T/A Tour leads by 19
A
77
B
58
Why this score
SourceLong Trail T/A TourPureContact LS
Tyre Reviews owners 77 58

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Long Trail T/A Tour leads by 23
A
93
B
70
Why this score
SourceLong Trail T/A TourPureContact LS
Tyre Reviews owners 93 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Long Trail T/A Tour leads by 5
A
90
B
85
Why this score
SourceLong Trail T/A TourPureContact LS
Tyre Reviews owners 90 85

Scores at a glance

CategoryBFGoodrich Long Trail T/A TourContinental PureContact LS
Relative Score 83 75
Dry 87 86
Wet 70 79
Snow – 48
Comfort 77 58
Treadwear 93 70
Handling 90 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour

The BFGoodrich Long Trail TA Tour is viewed as a reliable, long-lasting tire for dry and mixed-use driving conditions. While it offers respectable tread life and highway performance, it is significantly compromised in winter weather, making it unsuitable for regions with frequent snow or ice.

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity
  • Reliable performance on dry pavement
  • Suitable for balanced city and highway commuting

Cons

  • Poor traction in snow and ice
  • Limited confidence during cornering in winter conditions
  • Subpar performance in wet weather

Observations

  • Users report achieving a total tread life of approximately 50,000 to 60,000 miles under mixed driving conditions.
Tire B Continental PureContact LS

The Continental PureContact LS receives a polarized reception from users, balancing praise for its longevity and wet-weather performance against significant complaints regarding noise levels and cold-weather flat-spotting. While some drivers appreciate the tire's luxury-oriented ride and tread life, others report inconsistent quality and frustrating vibration issues that detract from the overall ownership experience.

Pros

  • Extended tread life compared to performance-oriented alternatives
  • Reliable grip and stability in wet road conditions
  • Comfortable, vibration-isolating ride quality
  • Improved handling characteristics over many original equipment tires

Cons

  • Persistent flat-spotting issues, particularly in colder temperatures
  • Excessive road noise and humming at highway speeds
  • Diminished traction and grip performance as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent winter weather capability

Observations

  • Owners of luxury sedans like the Lexus ES 350 and Lincoln Continental reported significant issues with morning flat-spotting and vibrations.
  • Users transitioning from performance-focused tires, such as the ExtremeContact DWS 06, noted a distinct trade-off between increased tread life and a loss of sporty steering feedback.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour B · Continental PureContact LS
CategoryTouring Summer tireAll Season Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—700 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Continental

Winner: BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Continental PureContact LS if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour scores 93 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour scores 77 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 79 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour scores 90 vs 85 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Long Trail T/A Tour
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.