72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental Sport Contact vs Yokohama Advan A032R — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental Sport Contact — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan A032R if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Advan A032R leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact | Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Sport Contact leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact | Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Sport Contact leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact | Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 50 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Sport Contact leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact | Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 40 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Advan A032R leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact | Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact | Yokohama Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 66 |
| Dry | 81 | 100 |
| Wet | 73 | 70 |
| Comfort | 71 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 40 |
| Handling | 73 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Sport Contact is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry weather handling and provides a balanced, comfortable driving experience. While many users praise its longevity and consistent grip, consensus is mixed regarding its wet-weather performance as the tread wears down, with some users reporting a significant drop-off in traction.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Commendable tread life and durability for a performance-oriented tire
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- High fuel efficiency for a performance tire
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet weather performance as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread wear reports ranging from 6,000 to 40,000 miles
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Potential for sudden loss of grip in specific conditions
Observations
- Users with lighter, front-wheel-drive vehicles reported high satisfaction with longevity, sometimes exceeding 30,000 miles.
- Drivers of high-torque or powerful vehicles noted faster front-tire wear and occasional traction issues under hard acceleration.
The Yokohama Advan A032R is a highly capable semi-slick tire that excels in dry track conditions, offering predictable handling and impressive lateral and longitudinal grip. While it performs reliably within its optimal temperature window, users should be prepared for rapid tread wear and a performance drop-off if the tire exceeds its thermal operating range.
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time to reach optimal operating temperature
- Predictable and progressive grip characteristics
- Excellent traction during hard braking and cornering
- Surprisingly manageable performance in damp conditions for a semi-slick
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under intensive track use
- Performance degradation when exceeding optimal thermal limits
- Limited longevity compared to street-oriented tires
Observations
- The tire is best suited for short-to-medium track sessions of 15 to 25 minutes to maintain peak performance.
- Users report that the tire remains effective for approximately 500 to 800 kilometers of track use before significant wear occurs.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact | B · Yokohama Advan A032R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental
66
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental Sport Contact — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan A032R if dry and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental Sport Contact scores 66 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental Sport Contact scores 71 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Advan A032R scores 100 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan A032R scores 85 vs 73 on handling.
Tire A · Continental Sport Contact
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A032R
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Sport Contact also compared with
Yokohama Advan A032R also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.