Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 800 | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 82 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 800 | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 78 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 800 | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 86 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 800 | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 77 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 800 | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 80 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 800 | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 800 | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 82 |
| Wet | 93 | 78 |
| Snow | 90 | 86 |
| Comfort | 89 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 80 |
| Handling | 88 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 800 is widely regarded by users as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions. While primarily designed for winter, many owners report that it maintains respectable handling and durability even when used outside of its intended temperature range.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, and compressed snow
- Reliable braking and handling performance on wet and icy surfaces
- Impressive tread longevity even under varied driving conditions
- Comfortable ride quality compared to standard summer tires
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to some summer tire models
- Reduced handling precision and performance when temperatures exceed 10°C
- Soft compound can feel less stable during aggressive dry-weather driving
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Ford Fiesta, Toyota Aygo, and Opel Corsa report high satisfaction with snow-starting capabilities on steep inclines.
- The tire is noted for maintaining safety and preventing sliding even on older vehicle platforms lacking modern ABS systems.
The Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is widely regarded as a high-value performance winter tire that balances dry and wet road handling with competent snow traction. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and affordability compared to premium alternatives, some report concerns regarding high-speed stability and potential issues with tire uniformity.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive noise suppression and ride comfort
- Strong performance on dry and wet surfaces
- Reliable traction in typical winter snow and slush conditions
Cons
- Vague handling and stability at higher highway speeds
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' feel
- Potential for flat-spotting and balancing issues
- Diminishing snow grip as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and RWD vehicles report good snow traction, though some note minor slippage during aggressive cornering on wet surfaces.
- Performance-oriented vehicles like the Subaru BRZ and Tesla Model 3 find the tire to be a capable, budget-friendly alternative to extreme winter tires.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 800 | B · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Kumho
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 800 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 88 vs 71 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 93 vs 78 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 89 vs 77 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 88 vs 80 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.