76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
195 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Dunlop Direzza DZ102 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER300 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER300 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER300 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER300 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 67 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER300 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER300 | Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 69 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Dunlop Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 72 |
| Dry | 83 | 82 |
| Wet | 76 | 73 |
| Comfort | 71 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 67 |
| Handling | 73 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER300 is widely regarded as a reliable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in dry conditions and provides predictable handling for daily commuting. While many users praise its longevity and consistent performance, a significant portion of the user base reports issues with increased road noise, a firm ride, and a noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability, with many users reporting high mileage.
- Strong, predictable dry-weather handling and stability.
- Good value for money as a premium touring option.
- Consistent performance across a wide variety of vehicle types.
Cons
- Significant road noise, particularly on older or rougher asphalt surfaces.
- Noticeable deterioration in wet-weather traction and braking as the tire ages.
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality that lacks comfort on uneven roads.
- Poor performance in snow and near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or high-torque diesel engines reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
- Drivers using lower-profile sizes (e.g., 45-series) frequently noted a harsher, less comfortable ride quality.
- Some owners of compact cars noted that the tire's stiff sidewall contributed to a 'nervous' or 'twitchy' handling feel on certain road surfaces.
The Dunlop Direzza DZ102 is widely regarded as a high-value, entry-level Ultra-High Performance summer tire that balances impressive dry grip and comfort with an attractive price point. While many users praise its handling and road manners, consensus is split regarding its longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting rapid tread wear and inconsistent traction in heavy rain.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- Surprisingly high levels of ride comfort for a performance tire
- Low road noise levels compared to competitors in the segment
Cons
- Rapid or inconsistent tread wear
- Inconsistent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Difficult to balance for some users
Observations
- Users with high-torque or tuned vehicles (300hp+) report that the tire provides sufficient grip to manage power delivery effectively.
- Drivers on 17-inch and 18-inch setups frequently highlight a significant improvement in comfort compared to previous touring or OEM tires.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to correct inflation pressures, with improper settings leading to immediate degradation in feel.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Dunlop Direzza DZ102 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Bridgestone
72
/ 100
Dunlop
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 78 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 73 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 76 vs 73 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Dunlop Direzza DZ102
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 also compared with
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.