Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Falken ZE912 vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken ZE912

Summer Premium Touring tires

Falken ZE912 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
200 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
74
Comfort
79
Treadwear
71
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

Summer High Performance tires

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
30/100
1 owner review
Dry
60
Wet
30
Comfort
30
Treadwear
–
Handling
10

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken ZE912 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZE912 leads by 22
A — Falken ZE912
82
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
60
Why this score
SourceZE912ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tyre Reviews owners 82 60

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ZE912 leads by 44
A — Falken ZE912
74
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
30
Why this score
SourceZE912ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tyre Reviews owners 74 30

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZE912 leads by 49
A — Falken ZE912
79
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
30
Why this score
SourceZE912ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tyre Reviews owners 79 30

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Falken ZE912
71
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
–
Why this score
SourceZE912ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tyre Reviews owners 71 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZE912 leads by 60
A — Falken ZE912
70
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
10
Why this score
SourceZE912ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tyre Reviews owners 70 10

Scores at a glance

Falken ZE912 vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Relative Score 76 32
Dry 82 60
Wet 74 30
Comfort 79 30
Treadwear 71 –
Handling 70 10

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken ZE912

The Falken ZE912 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range tire that excels in comfort and noise reduction, making it a popular choice for daily commuters. While many users praise its dry grip and predictable handling, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is polarized, with experiences varying significantly based on driving style and vehicle weight.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling
  • Good all-season versatility in mild conditions

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
  • Lack of rim protection

Observations

  • Users with heavier vehicles or those driving aggressively often report significantly faster tread wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW 3-series, Subaru Impreza) frequently noted that the soft sidewalls reduced steering feedback and cornering confidence compared to dedicated summer tires.
  • Owners of vehicles with 'odd' tire sizes (e.g., Nissan Note) found these to be a cost-effective solution when premium options were limited.
Tire B Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

The Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP receives highly critical feedback, with users reporting significant deficiencies in handling, traction, and structural integrity. The consensus suggests that the tire fails to meet the performance expectations of an Ultra High Performance category, leading to a poor driving experience and safety concerns.

Cons

  • Severe lack of traction and grip
  • Excessive road noise
  • Poor structural integrity and sidewall stability
  • Unpredictable handling and excessive understeer

Observations

  • Users reported significant instability and swaying during direction changes when the tires were mounted on the rear axle.
  • The tire's soft construction was noted to cause handling issues even at moderate speeds, requiring electronic stability control intervention.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Nexen

Winner: Falken ZE912 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZE912 scores 70 vs 10 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZE912 scores 79 vs 30 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE912 scores 74 vs 30 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZE912 scores 82 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.