Head-to-head Updated

Firestone WeatherGrip vs Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Reviews found online64–
  2. 69

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Reviews found online68–
  3. 73

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Reviews found online76–
  4. 66

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Reviews found online63–
  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Reviews found online69–
  6. 54

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Professional tests (TWG score)54–
    Reviews found online56–
  7. 62

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherGripCrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
    Reviews found online62–
Scores at a glance
Firestone WeatherGrip vs Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone WeatherGripContinental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
Relative Score 64 –
Dry 65 –
Wet 69 –
Snow 73 –
Comfort 66 –
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 54 –
Handling 62 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

WeatherGrip

CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WeatherGrip

Pros

  • Outstanding snow and winter weather traction
  • Confident wet weather and rain grip
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Faster tread wear due to the softer rubber compound
  • Noticeable drop in fuel economy (MPG)
  • Subpar dry pavement performance compared to dedicated summer or standard all-season tires
All owner themes in the WeatherGrip review

Tire B CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone WeatherGrip B · Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
CategoryAll Weather—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available49—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG640 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone WeatherGrip

Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology

Only Firestone WeatherGrip has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Firestone WeatherGrip
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.