58
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
44/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Fuzion Touring vs Vredestein Arctrac — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Arctrac — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 73 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 76 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 76 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Touring | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Fuzion Touring | Vredestein Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 85 |
| Dry | 63 | 87 |
| Wet | 51 | 87 |
| Snow | 47 | – |
| Comfort | 52 | 70 |
| Noise | 59 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 90 |
| Handling | 61 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Vredestein Arctrac is highly regarded by users, with reviewers noting that its performance surpasses that of premium competitors like Nokian and Bridgestone Blizzak. It is positioned as a top-tier winter tire choice that delivers exceptional value and reliability in cold-weather conditions.
Pros
- Superior winter performance compared to industry-leading competitors
- High level of driver confidence in snowy or icy conditions
- Excellent value proposition
Cons
- Limited user feedback available to assess long-term tread life or dry-road handling
Observations
- The tire is perceived as a high-performance alternative for drivers transitioning from established premium winter tire brands.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Fuzion Touring | B · Vredestein Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Fuzion
85
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Arctrac — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Arctrac scores 87 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Arctrac scores 90 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Arctrac scores 87 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Arctrac scores 87 vs 63 on dry.
Tire A · Fuzion Touring
Tire B · Vredestein Arctrac
More comparisons
Also compared with
Fuzion Touring also compared with
Vredestein Arctrac also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.