89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Snow Grabber+ vs Michelin X-Ice North 4 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
8 professional tests
User signal (40%)
85/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Snow Grabber+ — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Snow Grabber+ leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 78 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Snow Grabber+ leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Snow Grabber+ leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 92 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Snow Grabber+ leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 12 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Snow Grabber+ leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Snow Grabber+ leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Snow Grabber+ | X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Snow Grabber+ | Michelin X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 79 |
| Dry | 90 | 82 |
| Wet | 87 | 81 |
| Snow | 95 | 89 |
| Comfort | 77 | 41 |
| Noise | – | 86 |
| Treadwear | 95 | 89 |
| Handling | 87 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Snow Grabber+ is highly regarded for its reliable winter performance, particularly in deep snow and challenging road conditions. While users consistently praise its grip and safety, some note trade-offs regarding increased road noise and higher fuel consumption.
Pros
- Excellent traction and capability in deep snow
- Strong grip on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Maintains rubber flexibility over multiple winter seasons
- Provides a smooth and confidence-inspiring ride
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise
- Negative impact on fuel economy
- Lower initial tread depth compared to some competitors
Observations
- Users report consistent performance across various winter conditions, suggesting the tire is well-suited for vehicles requiring reliable snow extraction.
The Michelin X-Ice North 4 is widely regarded as a top-tier studded winter tire, offering class-leading traction on ice and packed snow. While users consistently praise its superior noise suppression and handling compared to competitors, long-term stud retention remains a point of contention for some owners.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence on icy and snow-covered surfaces
- Significantly lower road noise compared to traditional studded winter tires
- High tread longevity and durability over multiple winter seasons
- Predictable handling and improved vehicle feedback in adverse conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent long-term stud retention reported by some users
- Slightly wallowy or vague handling feel on dry pavement
- Tendency to collect snow in the tread pattern at low speeds
- Reduced performance in deep, loose snow over hard-packed surfaces
Observations
- Users noted that narrower tire dimensions can contribute to a wallowy feel on dry roads.
- Performance is highly regarded across diverse vehicle types, ranging from AWD sedans like the Kia Stinger to older, analog sports cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Snow Grabber+ | B · Michelin X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
General
79
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: General Snow Grabber+ — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Snow Grabber+ scores 77 vs 41 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Snow Grabber+ scores 90 vs 82 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Snow Grabber+ scores 87 vs 81 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
General Snow Grabber+ scores 95 vs 89 on snow.
Tire A · General Snow Grabber+
Tire B · Michelin X-Ice North 4
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Snow Grabber+ also compared with
Michelin X-Ice North 4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.