70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
225 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
76/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
83/100
198 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE050A leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 94 |
| Tire Rack owners | 74 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | 95 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 95 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 62 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 81 |
| Dry | 83 | 81 |
| Wet | 70 | 90 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 60 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 93 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 79 |
| Handling | 72 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, offering sharp steering response and excellent feedback for spirited driving. While many users praise its grip and stability in warm, dry conditions, it is frequently criticized for its harsh ride quality, significant road noise, and poor performance in cold or wintry weather. Consensus suggests it is a capable OEM-style performance tire, though its longevity and wet-weather confidence vary significantly depending on the vehicle and driving style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling precision
- Strong, communicative sidewalls providing excellent steering feedback
- Predictable performance at the limit in warm conditions
- Robust construction with good resistance to impact damage
Cons
- Harsh ride quality, particularly on low-profile sizes
- High levels of road noise that often increase as the tire wears
- Poor performance and lack of traction in cold, wet, or snowy conditions
- Rapid tread wear reported by many users, especially on high-torque or heavy vehicles
Observations
- Users with BMWs and other vehicles equipped with Run-Flat (RFT) versions of this tire report significantly harsher ride quality and 'crashy' behavior over road imperfections.
- Drivers of heavy or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 370Z, Commodore, Audi S-Line) frequently report accelerated tread wear and increased noise levels compared to lighter, lower-powered cars.
- The tire's performance is highly sensitive to temperature; users note that it requires significant warm-up time to reach optimal grip levels.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is widely regarded as a premium, comfort-oriented performance tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While it receives high praise for its quiet ride, wet-weather traction, and overall refinement, it is frequently criticized by enthusiasts for having soft sidewalls that can compromise steering precision and feedback during spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily commuting
- High value-for-money compared to direct competitors like Michelin
- Excellent longevity for many users, particularly in non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and 'mushy' handling
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear on high-torque vehicles
- Reduced rim protection compared to previous generations
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage from potholes
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5/6 series) frequently report excellent mileage and comfort, especially with Run-Flat (ROF) variants.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks and sports cars often find the sidewalls too soft for track use or aggressive cornering, preferring stiffer alternatives.
- The tire is noted to have a significant 'bed-in' period, with performance and handling characteristics improving noticeably after 1,000–2,500 km.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
The Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is recognized as an older high-performance summer tire design that still delivers strong dry grip, handling, and cornering capabilities. While some users appreciate their longevity with proper maintenance, others note reduced wet and cold weather traction and point out that newer alternatives are available.
r/skoda
·26 upvotes ·2022-03-09
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
r/cars
·6 upvotes ·2017-11-18
“The RE050A is an old design. Tirerack tested it all the way back in 2004 That isn't to say it's bad, it compared well to other tires in its class. Bridgestone also makes some really good tires (Blizzaks and RE-71Rs come to mind, experience with both, they are great tires).”
r/FiestaST
·2 upvotes ·2018-05-14
“I've gone through two sets of RE050As, and I've got 75k on my car. The second set is in dire need of replacement. HTH.”
r/cars
·2 upvotes ·2017-11-18
“My FiST came with the Potenza RE050A and i am pleasantly surprised with how well they handle. Excellent grip from acceleration and cornering as well as excellent stopping power. The only problem is when it gets cold out and if it's wet the tires don't grip as well as I'd like but other than that no complaints.”
Top themes
#Dry grip and handling#Wet and cold performance#Tread life and mileage#Run-flat options#Aging tire design#Pricing and value
Based on 13 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is generally mixed, with users comparing it to competitors like Michelin and Bridgestone regarding handling, noise, and wear. While some drivers appreciate their performance and find good deals or rebates on them, others note that competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport offer better wet grip and lower noise, or that snow performance is lacking as expected from a summer tire.
r/GolfGTI
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-17
“Most recent 3 tyres for me: Current at >40,000km - Bridgestone Potenza RE003 ~20,000km - Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ~35,000km - Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 The Pilot Sport 4 has been my favourite of the three by far - handling felt just as good as the Goodyear Eagle F1 whilst having less road noise and incredible wet grip, but they just didn't last long. But I enjoyed them so much I'll try the Pilot Sport 5's next as they supposedly have improvements to tread wear.”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“Hi there, I need to put new tyres on my f30 330d. I want to switch away from run flats. The tyres will be used all year round. I was veering towards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as recommended by this website (although I am open to other suggestions): ... However the snow performance seems to be lacking (not too surprising given they are a summer tyre) ... Therefore I was wondering about Michelin crossclimate instead: ... I live in a rural part of the south east so I get no more than two weeks of snow a year but face driving on un-gritted roads when it does snow. The rub here is that I'm compromising the cars performance for the rest of the year to make sure I'm OK for 2 weeks in winter! Any thoughts on which option would be best for somebody in my position? Thanks”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“Hi, I currently have Falken Azenis FK510s all round and i need to replace both front tyres. Sticking with Runflats, are these a good option: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (225/40 R19 93Y) ROF XL *BMW [F] and is there any downsides to running 2 different brands? The back don't need changing yet car is a 335d xDrive Thanks for any info”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2018-05-28
“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”
Top themes
#Wet and dry handling#Comparison with Michelin#Tread wear and lifespan#Road noise and comfort#Pricing and sales deals
Based on 11 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 7 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 140 A A | 240 - 300 AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 42 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Bridgestone
81
/ 100
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 90 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 79 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 81 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 68 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.