66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Alpin — better snow, treadwear and handling. Pick the Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin leads by 55
Why this score
| Source | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ultra Grip Performance 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Michelin Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 80 |
| Dry | 79 | 82 |
| Wet | 73 | 82 |
| Snow | 10 | 65 |
| Comfort | 81 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 86 |
| Handling | 71 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between those who find it a top-tier performance winter tire and those who report significant traction failures in snow and ice. While many praise its comfort, quietness, and wet-weather handling, a notable subset of reviewers experienced poor grip in winter conditions, leading to inconsistent performance reports.
Pros
- Excellent comfort and low noise levels
- Strong performance in wet and cold conditions
- Reliable handling and traction on dry tarmac
- High-quality compound offering superior braking and cornering for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent and sometimes dangerous traction on snow and ice
- Vague steering feedback on tarmac
- Performance degradation in warmer temperatures
- High price point relative to some competitors
Observations
- Users noted that the tire performs best in cold temperatures and loses its 'sticky' feel when ambient temperatures rise.
- Some users reported that the tire's performance is highly dependent on specific road conditions, with some finding it superior to Michelin Alpin and Continental alternatives, while others found it inferior to Nokian products.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in dry conditions and offers exceptional longevity. While some users find its performance on deep snow and ice to be merely adequate, it is highly recommended for drivers in milder winter climates who prioritize handling responsiveness and tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Superior dry road handling and responsiveness
- Consistent and even wear patterns
- Reliable performance in mild winter conditions
Cons
- Average performance on deep snow and ice
- Limited availability and supply chain issues
- Higher initial price point compared to some competitors
Observations
- Users operating on high-mileage cycles, such as the Subaru Outback, reported impressive durability with up to 40,000 miles of service.
- The tire is noted for maintaining structural integrity and even shoulder wear under demanding driving styles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Goodyear
80
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin — better snow, treadwear and handling. Pick the Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Pilot Alpin scores 65 vs 10 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Alpin scores 86 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Alpin scores 82 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Alpin scores 82 vs 73 on wet.
Tire A · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Alpin
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 also compared with
Michelin Pilot Alpin also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.