Tests 77 · 11 tests Owners 77 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test (wet handling)
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 84–76
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 11 tests Owners 77 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test (wet handling)
Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 84 · 6,299 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test (rolling resistance)
“My 8-month experience with Michelin Pilot Sport 5 – honest thoughts after highway + city use Switched to Michelin Pilot Sport 5s about 8 months ago on my Hyundai Creta]and figured I'd share a proper update since I couldn't find many India-based long-term reviews when I was researching. Background: I drive a mix of Delhi–Gurugram highway stretches and stop-go city traffic. Previous tyres were Ceat tyres. Wet grip: This is where they genuinely shine. Monsoon season in NCR was the real test — braking distances felt noticeably shorter than my previous set, and I never had that nervous moment on waterlogged roads near Dhaula Kuan. Dry handling: Confident and predictable. Not much to complain about here. Cornering feel is crisp, especially at highway speeds. Ride comfort: Slightly firmer than my old tyres, which I expected given the performance focus. Not harsh — just different. Long highway runs are still comfortable. Noise: Quieter than I expected for a performance tyre. Road noise on concrete sections of NH-48 is very manageable. Fuel efficiency: Marginal difference — maybe 0.3–0.5 kmpl lower, hard to say definitively. Wear so far: Looking good at 8 months / ~7,000 km. No uneven wear patterns. Would I buy again? Probably yes, especially if wet weather safety matters to you. Price premium over budget options is real, but the wet grip gives peace of mind. Happy to answer any questions. Anyone else running Michelins in Indian conditions? Read more”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 91 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 86 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 96% | 99% |
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 80% |
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Reviews found online | 78 | – |
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 69 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 81 |
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 57 | 38 |
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 76 |
| Source | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 80 | 86 |
| Category | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 84 |
| Dry | 72 | 89 |
| Wet | 85 | 92 |
| Snow | 82 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 74 |
| Noise | 60 | 49 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 83 |
| Handling | 80 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
UltraGrip Performance+
Pilot Sport 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | UltraGrip Performance+ | Pilot Sport 5 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 94% #4/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 86% #10/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +8.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #8/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 97% #3/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 96% #13/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | −2.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | −6.4 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #4/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 95% #8/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3.6 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 84% #6/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 83% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | +1.0 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 96% #4/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | +1.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 59% #9/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 90% #2/3 · Michelin Pilot Sport VS EV Specific Performance Tyres | −31.5 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 56% #12/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 39% #10/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +17.0 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 85% #6/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 88% #2/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | −3.0 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/9 · 2020 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | 17% #6/48 · 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 92% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 99% #3/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | −7.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 90% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 80% #5/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | +10.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 92% #2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 | −11.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 89% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 | +11.1 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #8/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #13/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 97% #3/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −1.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 80% #6/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 | +20.0 | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to older generations and direct rivals. While some enthusiast drivers find the sidewalls a bit soft or note less extreme dry grip and steering feel compared to hardcore track tires like the PS4S or SportContact 7, it is widely praised as the ultimate daily-driver performance tire.
“Tyres: Ps5’s initial impression Tyres seem to be a common question across a few forums so I thought ide share. So after 12 months (27,000kms) with my i20n, I was (over) due to replace my tyres. While I loved the p-zeros, I wasn’t keen on the short life, so went with the pilot sport 5. My impressions as follows: Initial impression: a lot less road noise than the p-zero City drive: no noticeable difference (apart from the reduced noise) Highway drive: handling is not noticeably changed, but the reduced noise is really appreciated here! Twisty’s: the difference here is notable, ps5’s don’t provide quite the same aggressive limitless grip feel as the p-zeros. Still holds the line perfectly but noted a bit of slip on the inside front wheel under heavy throttle. I do approx 100km on back roads commuting to and from work every day, so I’ll update this thread if I find anything worth reporting Read more”
“In my experience they are quite long wearing tires and well worth the cost. I used to get around 40k out of most tyres. My first set of ps4’s lasted 55k and now the ps5’s are trending to beat it. I'm a pretty spirited driver around the roundabouts of Canberra too, though I only have a hatch so experiences may vary. As to performance I've driven them on my i30 n-line and other people’s i30N, BRZ, tesla 3, and stinger and the tyres have more grip than I have guts to push them on public roads. In both wet and dry they are very confidence inspiring and a hell of a lot of fun.”
“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”
Based on 130 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ if noise matters most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 72 on dry.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 60 vs 49 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 83 vs 75 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 85 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.