75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Wrangler HP vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
137 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Goodyear Wrangler HP and Michelin Energy Saver are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Wrangler HP is stronger on snow and handling. Michelin Energy Saver is stronger on treadwear and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 53 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 71 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Wrangler HP leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 43 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 62 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 37 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 55 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Wrangler HP leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Wrangler HP | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Wrangler HP | Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 75 |
| Dry | 79 | 81 |
| Wet | 71 | 76 |
| Snow | 75 | 52 |
| Comfort | 78 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 37 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 85 |
| Handling | 80 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Wrangler HP is perceived as a capable all-weather performer, offering reliable grip across diverse seasonal conditions. Users transitioning from premium competitors find its handling characteristics to be surprisingly competent for long-distance touring.
Pros
- Excellent grip in varied weather conditions
- Reliable performance for long-distance travel
- Strong all-season versatility
Cons
- Limited brand recognition compared to top-tier competitors
- Lack of extensive long-term tread life data in user feedback
Observations
- Performance noted as highly effective on premium SUVs like the Alfa Stelvio
The Michelin Energy Saver is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for longevity and fuel efficiency, often exceeding 40,000–60,000 miles for many users. While it excels in dry conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride, it receives consistent criticism for a decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down and a tendency for the rubber compound to develop sidewall cracking over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Reliable dry-weather handling and stability
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Susceptibility to sidewall cracking and dry rot after 3-4 years
- Hard compound can feel 'skating' or insecure in cold or wet conditions
- Lack of road feedback for spirited driving
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving on rough, pothole-prone roads noted that the sidewalls can be fragile and prone to damage.
- Drivers of small hatchbacks (e.g., VW Polo, Ford Fiesta) frequently reported that the tire significantly improved steering lightness and overall handling compared to budget alternatives.
- Owners of high-mileage commuters and taxis consistently praise the tire for its cost-per-mile value, despite the performance drop-off in later years.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Wrangler HP | B · Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Goodyear
75
/ 100
Michelin
Too close to call: Goodyear Wrangler HP and Michelin Energy Saver are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Wrangler HP is stronger on snow and handling. Michelin Energy Saver is stronger on treadwear and wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Goodyear Wrangler HP scores 75 vs 52 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy Saver scores 85 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Wrangler HP scores 80 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy Saver scores 76 vs 71 on wet.
Tire A · Goodyear Wrangler HP
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Wrangler HP also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.