Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
67/100
Owner ratings
Dry
81
Wet
77
Snow
73
Comfort
83
Noise
82
Treadwear
85
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Kumho Crugen HT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
78
Comfort
83
Noise
87
Treadwear
73
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 and Kumho Crugen HT51 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Crugen HT51 is stronger on wet, snow and noise.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 4
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
81
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
85
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 88
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 97

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 10
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
77
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 92
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 94

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 5
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
73
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
78
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 91
Tire Rack owners – 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 60
SimpleTire owners – 92

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
83
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
83
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 94
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners – 67
SimpleTire owners – 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 5
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
82
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 87
SimpleTire owners – 94

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dynapro AT RF08 leads by 12
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
85
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
73
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners – 73
SimpleTire owners – 95

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 2
A — Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
75
B — Kumho Crugen HT51
77
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT RF08Crugen HT51
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Scores at a glance

Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro AT RF08Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 80 81
Dry 81 85
Wet 77 87
Snow 73 78
Comfort 83 83
Noise 82 87
Treadwear 85 73
Handling 75 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Dynapro AT RF08

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Crugen HT51

The Kumho Crugen H/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile highway tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction comparable to premium competitors. While users appreciate its fuel efficiency and handling characteristics, long-term ownership experiences are polarized by reports of uneven tread wear and significant noise degradation over time.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Positive impact on fuel economy
  • Quiet highway performance during early stages of ownership

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature or uneven shoulder wear
  • Limited capability in deep mud or severe winter conditions
  • Noise levels becoming intrusive between 45-55 mph

Observations

  • Users operating heavy-duty trucks like the Ram 1500 report stable handling and good wet-weather confidence.
  • Owners of SUVs like the 4Runner note that while the tire performs well for highway and light off-road use, it is susceptible to shoulder wear patterns.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 and Kumho Crugen HT51 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Crugen HT51 is stronger on wet, snow and noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro AT RF08 scores 85 vs 73 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 78 vs 73 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 82 on noise.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT RF08
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.