Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 80 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 60 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 60 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 70 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 | Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 67 |
| Dry | 86 | 80 |
| Wet | 78 | 60 |
| Comfort | 87 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 70 |
| Handling | 77 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting SUV tire that offers impressive tread life and balanced performance for daily driving. While most users praise its comfort and quiet operation, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling during more aggressive maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High value-to-cost ratio compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable dry-weather handling and cornering
Cons
- Potential for severe understeer in wet or damp conditions
- Inconsistent performance when pushed at higher speeds
- Limited traction on ice
- Ride comfort can be polarizing depending on vehicle suspension
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to proper wheel alignment, which significantly impacts handling and longevity.
- The tire demonstrates high durability even under heavy-duty conditions, such as frequent trailering or high-mileage highway use on mid-sized SUVs.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 | B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 87 vs 60 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 78 vs 60 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 86 vs 70 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 77 vs 70 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.