Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Summer Premium Touring tires

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
78
Comfort
87
Treadwear
86
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta HP4 716

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
1 owner review
Dry
80
Wet
60
Comfort
60
Treadwear
70
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 6
A — Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
86
B — Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
80
Why this score
SourceDynapro HP RA23Ecsta HP4 716
Tyre Reviews owners 86 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 18
A — Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
78
B — Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
60
Why this score
SourceDynapro HP RA23Ecsta HP4 716
Tyre Reviews owners 78 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 27
A — Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
87
B — Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
60
Why this score
SourceDynapro HP RA23Ecsta HP4 716
Tyre Reviews owners 87 60

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 16
A — Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
86
B — Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
70
Why this score
SourceDynapro HP RA23Ecsta HP4 716
Tyre Reviews owners 86 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 7
A — Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
77
B — Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
70
Why this score
SourceDynapro HP RA23Ecsta HP4 716
Tyre Reviews owners 77 70

Scores at a glance

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Kumho Ecsta HP4 716: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP RA23Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
Relative Score 83 67
Dry 86 80
Wet 78 60
Comfort 87 60
Treadwear 86 70
Handling 77 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

The Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting SUV tire that offers impressive tread life and balanced performance for daily driving. While most users praise its comfort and quiet operation, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling during more aggressive maneuvers.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • High value-to-cost ratio compared to premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable dry-weather handling and cornering

Cons

  • Potential for severe understeer in wet or damp conditions
  • Inconsistent performance when pushed at higher speeds
  • Limited traction on ice
  • Ride comfort can be polarizing depending on vehicle suspension

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to proper wheel alignment, which significantly impacts handling and longevity.
  • The tire demonstrates high durability even under heavy-duty conditions, such as frequent trailering or high-mileage highway use on mid-sized SUVs.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta HP4 716

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
SidewallBlackwall—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 87 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 78 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 86 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 77 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.