83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Kumho Ecsta KU19 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 and Kumho Ecsta KU19 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Ecsta KU19 is stronger on handling and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dynapro HP RA23 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU19 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro HP RA23 | Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 | Kumho Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 83 |
| Dry | 86 | 85 |
| Wet | 78 | 81 |
| Comfort | 87 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 79 |
| Handling | 77 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting SUV tire that offers impressive tread life and balanced performance for daily driving. While most users praise its comfort and quiet operation, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling during more aggressive maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High value-to-cost ratio compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable dry-weather handling and cornering
Cons
- Potential for severe understeer in wet or damp conditions
- Inconsistent performance when pushed at higher speeds
- Limited traction on ice
- Ride comfort can be polarizing depending on vehicle suspension
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to proper wheel alignment, which significantly impacts handling and longevity.
- The tire demonstrates high durability even under heavy-duty conditions, such as frequent trailering or high-mileage highway use on mid-sized SUVs.
The Kumho Ecsta KU19 is highly regarded by performance-oriented drivers for its exceptional balance of wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive premium alternatives. Users consistently praise the tire for its quiet operation, predictable handling, and ability to manage high-torque applications without excessive wheel spin.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip performance
- Superior noise suppression at highway speeds
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Improved ride compliance and road feedback
- Effective traction management for high-output vehicles
Cons
- Softer sidewall construction may not suit all driving styles
- Limited long-term tread life data available from current user reports
- Potential for inconsistent handling feel if mixed with stiffer-sidewall tires on the same axle
Observations
- Owners of high-torque vehicles, such as V8 Commodores and XR6 Turbos, report significant improvements in off-the-line traction and reduced wheel spin.
- Users transitioning from premium tires like the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A noted that the KU19 offers better stability on rough, uneven road surfaces by reducing tram-lining.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 | B · Kumho Ecsta KU19 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Hankook
83
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 and Kumho Ecsta KU19 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Ecsta KU19 is stronger on handling and wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 86 vs 77 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 86 vs 79 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta KU19 scores 81 vs 78 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU19
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KU19 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.