83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Icebear W440 vs Toyo NanoEnergy 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
60
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Icebear W440 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Icebear W440 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Icebear W440 leads by 42
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 44 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Icebear W440 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Icebear W440 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Icebear W440 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Icebear W440 | NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Icebear W440 | Toyo NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 60 |
| Dry | 82 | 68 |
| Wet | 86 | 44 |
| Comfort | 88 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 68 |
| Handling | 78 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
60
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Icebear W440 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that offers impressive performance in snow and ice at a competitive price point. While some users note a necessary break-in period where the tires feel initially slippery, the consensus highlights a significant improvement in traction for rear-wheel-drive vehicles in challenging winter conditions.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence on snow and ice
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Noticeable performance improvement for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Reliable grip on ungritted and steep winter roads
Cons
- Noticeable 'slippery' sensation during the initial 100-mile break-in period
- Performance is strictly categorized as a budget-friendly option rather than a top-tier premium performer
- Mixed feedback on overall refinement compared to more expensive alternatives
Observations
- Users driving rear-wheel-drive platforms, such as the BMW 5 Series and Mazda Eunos, reported a transformative improvement in winter handling.
- The tire is noted for providing sufficient dry and wet grip once the initial break-in phase is complete.
The Toyo NanoEnergy 2 receives highly polarized feedback, with users generally divided between those who appreciate its comfort and those who find its wet-weather performance dangerously inadequate. While some drivers report satisfactory dry-road handling and ride quality, a significant portion of the user base highlights poor traction and premature ABS intervention in wet conditions.
Pros
- High level of ride comfort
- Satisfactory dry-road grip for casual driving
- Low noise levels
- Good tread wear longevity
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Tendency to squeal during cornering
- Inconsistent handling compared to premium factory-fitted alternatives
- Lack of driver confidence in adverse conditions
Observations
- Users suggest the tire is best suited for small passenger cars rather than vehicles requiring high-performance handling.
- Owners of compact hatchbacks, such as the Fiat Stilo, reported significant dissatisfaction with the tire's grip levels compared to original equipment tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Icebear W440 | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Hankook
60
/ 100
Toyo
Winner: Hankook Icebear W440 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Icebear W440 scores 86 vs 44 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Icebear W440 scores 88 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Icebear W440 scores 78 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Icebear W440 scores 82 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Icebear W440
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Icebear W440 also compared with
Toyo NanoEnergy 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.