81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
89/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
79/100
77 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Arctrac — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Arctrac — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Arctrac leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 | Vredestein Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 85 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 85 | 87 |
| Snow | 78 | – |
| Comfort | 80 | 70 |
| Noise | 83 | – |
| Treadwear | 80 | 90 |
| Handling | 74 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-season tire that excels in wet and cold conditions. While most users praise its exceptional price-to-performance ratio and reliable handling in varied weather, some report concerns regarding road noise at highway speeds and inconsistent tread longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Strong value proposition with a competitive price point
- Reliable performance in cold temperatures and light-to-moderate snow
- Solid dry handling and steering responsiveness for an all-season tire
Cons
- Audible road noise or 'whining' at highway speeds (120-140 km/h)
- Reports of inconsistent tread wear or premature degradation
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer or specialized touring tires
- Occasional reports of sudden grip loss at the limit on specific vehicle setups
Observations
- EV owners noted that the tire can be noticeably noisier than specialized low-noise EV tires.
- Users with performance-oriented or heavier vehicles reported more rapid wear on the front axle.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles often praised the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and handling over OEM options.
The Vredestein Arctrac is highly regarded by users, with reviewers noting that its performance surpasses that of premium competitors like Nokian and Bridgestone Blizzak. It is positioned as a top-tier winter tire choice that delivers exceptional value and reliability in cold-weather conditions.
Pros
- Superior winter performance compared to industry-leading competitors
- High level of driver confidence in snowy or icy conditions
- Excellent value proposition
Cons
- Limited user feedback available to assess long-term tread life or dry-road handling
Observations
- The tire is perceived as a high-performance alternative for drivers transitioning from established premium winter tire brands.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 | B · Vredestein Arctrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Hankook
85
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Arctrac — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Arctrac scores 87 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 80 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Arctrac scores 90 vs 80 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Arctrac scores 87 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire B · Vredestein Arctrac
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 also compared with
Vredestein Arctrac also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.