Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Kinergy GT vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Kinergy GT

Grand Touring All-Season

Hankook Kinergy GT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
24/100
Owner ratings
Dry
74
Wet
60
Snow
34
Comfort
66
Noise
63
Treadwear
52
Handling
74

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

Summer High Performance tires

Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
30/100
1 owner review
Dry
60
Wet
30
Snow
–
Comfort
30
Noise
–
Treadwear
–
Handling
10

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy GT — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy GT leads by 14
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
74
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
60
Why this score
SourceKinergy GTArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tire Rack owners 72 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Kinergy GT leads by 30
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
60
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
30
Why this score
SourceKinergy GTArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tire Rack owners 60 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 30

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
34
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
–
Why this score
SourceKinergy GTArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tire Rack owners 36 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy GT leads by 36
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
66
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
30
Why this score
SourceKinergy GTArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tire Rack owners 63 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 30

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
63
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
52
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
–
Why this score
SourceKinergy GTArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tire Rack owners 50 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy GT leads by 64
A — Hankook Kinergy GT
74
B — Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
10
Why this score
SourceKinergy GTArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Tyre Reviews owners – 10

Scores at a glance

Hankook Kinergy GT vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy GTNexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Relative Score 67 32
Dry 74 60
Wet 60 30
Snow 34 –
Comfort 66 30
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 52 –
Handling 74 10

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Kinergy GT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

The Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP receives highly critical feedback, with users reporting significant deficiencies in handling, traction, and structural integrity. The consensus suggests that the tire fails to meet the performance expectations of an Ultra High Performance category, leading to a poor driving experience and safety concerns.

Cons

  • Severe lack of traction and grip
  • Excessive road noise
  • Poor structural integrity and sidewall stability
  • Unpredictable handling and excessive understeer

Observations

  • Users reported significant instability and swaying during direction changes when the tires were mounted on the rear axle.
  • The tire's soft construction was noted to cause handling issues even at moderate speeds, requiring electronic stability control intervention.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy GT B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
CategoryGrand Touring All-SeasonSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Nexen

Winner: Hankook Kinergy GT — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Kinergy GT scores 74 vs 10 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy GT scores 66 vs 30 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy GT scores 60 vs 30 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy GT scores 74 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy GT
Tire B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.