Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Yokohama ADVAN S.T. — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Yokohama ADVAN S.T.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 73 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 53 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 60 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 33 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 65 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 40 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 50 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 | Yokohama ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 49 |
| Dry | 88 | 73 |
| Wet | 83 | 53 |
| Comfort | 68 | 33 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 80 | 40 |
| Handling | 79 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers a comfortable, quiet ride for daily commuting. While it is frequently praised for its competitive pricing and balanced performance, some users report inconsistent wet-weather confidence and accelerated tread wear when subjected to heavier vehicle loads or aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption
- Predictable and stable handling for touring applications
Cons
- Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
- Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
- Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
- Sidewall durability concerns, including reports of cracking
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., MPVs like the Sharan or SUVs) report significantly faster tread wear and reduced longevity.
- Drivers noted that the tire performs best as a comfort-oriented touring tire, with some users finding it less responsive or 'dull' on smaller 16-inch rim sizes compared to 17-inch variants.
- Performance is highly sensitive to tread depth; wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance drop off noticeably once the tire reaches the 3-4mm wear mark.
The Yokohama Advan ST receives highly critical feedback from users, with consensus pointing toward poor durability and significant quality control issues. Owners frequently report premature failure, including structural distortions and sidewall bulges, alongside disappointing performance in wet conditions.
Cons
- Poor structural integrity leading to premature bulges and distortions
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- High price point relative to performance
- Lack of traction and skittish handling on wet surfaces
- Excessive road noise
Observations
- Users reported significant durability failures within 6,000 miles of use.
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as the Lexus 450H, noted poor longevity and traction performance.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 | B · Yokohama ADVAN S.T. |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Yokohama
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 80 vs 40 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 68 vs 33 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 83 vs 53 on wet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 79 vs 50 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.