Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 211 reviews
Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus R-S4 leads, 72–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 69 · 212 reviews
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ADVAN A052 +480Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 81 90 -
67
Wet
ADVAN A052 +673Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – 79 Reviews found online 66 65 -
–
Snow
No comparison72Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Reviews found online – 73 -
64
Comfort
ADVAN A052 +569Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 60 63 -
68
Noise
ADVAN A052 +876Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – 77 Reviews found online 70 75 -
71
Treadwear
Ventus R-S4 +1853Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Reviews found online 75 44 -
81
Handling
ADVAN A052 +283Why this score
Source Ventus R-S4 ADVAN A052 Reviews found online 81 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus R-S4 | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 72 |
| Comfort | 64 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 53 |
| Handling | 81 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Ventus R-S4
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus R-S4
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ADVAN A052
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Ventus R-S4
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama ADVAN A052
The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 21 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus R-S4
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus R-S4 and Yokohama ADVAN A052 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama ADVAN A052 is stronger on noise, wet and comfort.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 71 vs 53 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 76 vs 68 on noise.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 73 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 69 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.