81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Winter i*cept evo vs Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo — better snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP72 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 78 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 86 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept evo | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 79 |
| Dry | 80 | 82 |
| Wet | 79 | 78 |
| Snow | 100 | 86 |
| Comfort | 79 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 80 |
| Handling | 72 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo is a polarizing winter tire that receives high praise for its exceptional snow and ice traction, particularly on heavier or AWD vehicles. However, user experiences regarding wet-weather grip and high-speed stability are inconsistent, with some drivers reporting significant issues with wheelspin and braking confidence in damp or wet conditions.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and on icy inclines
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Strong resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
- Good tread wear longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip leading to reports of wheelspin and ABS activation
- Lack of high-speed stability and precision on certain vehicle chassis
- Increased noise levels and reduced comfort compared to summer tires
- Performance degradation in warmer temperatures (squirmy handling)
Observations
- AWD and heavier vehicles (e.g., VW Touareg, Land Rover Discovery) report superior snow performance, often outperforming expectations.
- Users with high-torque FWD or RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW 1-series, tuned hatchbacks) frequently report issues with wheelspin and lack of wet-weather traction.
- Downsizing wheel diameter (e.g., moving from 17-inch to 16-inch) was noted to significantly improve snow and ice performance on some vehicles.
The Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is widely regarded as a high-value performance winter tire that balances dry and wet road handling with competent snow traction. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and affordability compared to premium alternatives, some report concerns regarding high-speed stability and potential issues with tire uniformity.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive noise suppression and ride comfort
- Strong performance on dry and wet surfaces
- Reliable traction in typical winter snow and slush conditions
Cons
- Vague handling and stability at higher highway speeds
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' feel
- Potential for flat-spotting and balancing issues
- Diminishing snow grip as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and RWD vehicles report good snow traction, though some note minor slippage during aggressive cornering on wet surfaces.
- Performance-oriented vehicles like the Subaru BRZ and Tesla Model 3 find the tire to be a capable, budget-friendly alternative to extreme winter tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo | B · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance Winter tire | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Hankook
79
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo — better snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 100 vs 86 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP72
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept evo also compared with
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.