Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 98 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 95 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 95 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 36 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 85 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 93 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP91 | Yokohama Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 86 |
| Dry | 85 | 92 |
| Wet | 87 | 88 |
| Comfort | 79 | 86 |
| Noise | 36 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 75 |
| Handling | 78 | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Crugen HP91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While many users praise its comfort and handling, there is a notable polarization regarding tread longevity, with some owners reporting excellent mileage and others experiencing premature wear.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Responsive handling and steering feedback
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reported across different vehicles
- Occasional reports of sidewall or structural integrity issues
- Some users report a softer compound that wears faster than expected
Observations
- Owners of larger SUVs like the Kia Sorento and Ford Kuga generally report high satisfaction with both longevity and performance.
- Users driving on rougher road surfaces, such as those in South Africa or Ukraine, reported faster degradation or structural issues.
- Some Hyundai Santa Fe owners noted dissatisfaction with wet-weather performance and rapid tread wear compared to other vehicle owners.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V103 is widely regarded as a capable performance tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, ride comfort, and low road noise. While many users praise its handling characteristics and value—particularly when purchased as discounted older stock—opinions on tread longevity are polarized, with some reporting rapid wear under spirited driving or track conditions.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- High levels of ride comfort and minimal road noise
- Strong value proposition, especially when found as clearance or 'new old stock' inventory
- Progressive handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Reports of diminished performance in cool or wet conditions as the tire ages
- Potential for rapid degradation when subjected to track-day usage
- Some users report significant loss of grip once the tread depth reaches critical levels
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the V103 reported a noticeable improvement in ride quality and comfort.
- Drivers of high-torque vehicles or those with aggressive chassis setups (e.g., increased camber) noted varying results in tread longevity, suggesting the tire is sensitive to alignment and driving style.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP91 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 420 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 93 vs 78 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 75 vs 67 on treadwear.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 92 vs 85 on dry.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 86 vs 79 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.