Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Crugen HP91

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Crugen HP91 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
78/100
21 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Comfort
79
Noise
36
Treadwear
67
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Sport V103

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
16 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
88
Comfort
86
Noise
–
Treadwear
75
Handling
93

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
85
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
92
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Advan Sport V103
Professional tests (TWG score) 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 89 98

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 1
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
87
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
88
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Advan Sport V103
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 95

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
79
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
86
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 79 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
36
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
–
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Advan Sport V103
Professional tests (TWG score) 36 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 8
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
67
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
75
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 67 85

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 15
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
78
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
93
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 78 93
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP91Yokohama Advan Sport V103
Relative Score 79 86
Dry 85 92
Wet 87 88
Comfort 79 86
Noise 36 –
Treadwear 67 75
Handling 78 93

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Crugen HP91

The Kumho Crugen HP91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While many users praise its comfort and handling, there is a notable polarization regarding tread longevity, with some owners reporting excellent mileage and others experiencing premature wear.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Responsive handling and steering feedback

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reported across different vehicles
  • Occasional reports of sidewall or structural integrity issues
  • Some users report a softer compound that wears faster than expected

Observations

  • Owners of larger SUVs like the Kia Sorento and Ford Kuga generally report high satisfaction with both longevity and performance.
  • Users driving on rougher road surfaces, such as those in South Africa or Ukraine, reported faster degradation or structural issues.
  • Some Hyundai Santa Fe owners noted dissatisfaction with wet-weather performance and rapid tread wear compared to other vehicle owners.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport V103

The Yokohama Advan Sport V103 is widely regarded as a capable performance tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, ride comfort, and low road noise. While many users praise its handling characteristics and value—particularly when purchased as discounted older stock—opinions on tread longevity are polarized, with some reporting rapid wear under spirited driving or track conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
  • High levels of ride comfort and minimal road noise
  • Strong value proposition, especially when found as clearance or 'new old stock' inventory
  • Progressive handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Reports of diminished performance in cool or wet conditions as the tire ages
  • Potential for rapid degradation when subjected to track-day usage
  • Some users report significant loss of grip once the tread depth reaches critical levels

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the V103 reported a noticeable improvement in ride quality and comfort.
  • Drivers of high-torque vehicles or those with aggressive chassis setups (e.g., increased camber) noted varying results in tread longevity, suggesting the tire is sensitive to alignment and driving style.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP91 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 93 vs 78 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 75 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 92 vs 85 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 86 vs 79 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.